The 3090 is hardly 20-30% faster than the 3070. Video3 8h45min 0.34sec/frame -ėh05min 0.27sec/frameĪt this very moment my results dont cover the 3x higher price of the 3090. Shouldn’t that at least be 3 saved hours ? So the 3090 saved me “just” 1h rendering time. With the 3090 it takes “only = still” 6 hours of upscaling the same video to 4K. I will not copy my complete results, but i can say with 3070 it took 7hours of upscaling a 1hour video from 720p to 4K (2160p). It was all kind of different videos in resolutions from 240p up to 2160p.Īfter the hardware change and the reinstall of the studio drivers i reloaded the 3070 queue list and tested the videos again on the RTX3090 - 1:1, 3070 vs 3090Īnd the results were more than disappointing. When we compare the specs it should be and looking at 3x the price of an 3070 - it REALLY should.īut before i exchanged the cards i prepared a decent list of to be rendered videos and noted the RTX3070 render times (frames per second). I was hoping the 3090 is at least double as fast as the 3070 with topaz. Harddisks are 1TB and 2TB nvme … 3500mb/sek read 3300mb/sek writeīut i still was not satisfied with the “long” rendering times.Īnd so i decided to buy a nvidia 3090 Founders Edition. (I know that my system only has PCIe3, but professionel hardware testers like tomshardwareguide say the difference between pcie3 and pcie4 with an RTX3090 is just 1-2%) The render times dropped 60% compared to my 1050ti. First i tried Topaz VEAI V1.7.1 on an Asus RTX 3070 OC 8GB.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |